Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Waterman Movie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Waterman Movie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I nominated this article for uncontroversial proposed deletion a few months ago, but it did not qualify as I had already nominated the article beforehand years back. I should've read the criteria for WP:PROD more carefully, that's on me. Since that initial nomination I think I can now properly articulate why the article should be deleted: It is lacking in sources as the film has not received significant coverage. The only notable sourced aspect of the subject matter is the involvement of Leslie Neilson, which could be merged into his article. Otherwise, the subject matter fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines outlined in WP:MOVIE. The article on the Waterman web series has been deleted for similar reasons concerning a lack of sources. I did some searching and haven't been able to find additional sources outside of two citations from Google Books and this article, both related to Neilson. LBWP (talk) 00:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. LBWP (talk) 01:03, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is nothing to indicate this uncompleted project is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. It's sad that this will likely never get released, but in the meantime there's just not enough to show that this stalled project meets NFF. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.